State Has Plenty of Land for Solar Project — Away from Homes
The proposed AES solar project along the N.M. 14 corridor in close proximity to Rancho Viejo and Eldorado has sparked discussions regarding its suitability as a clean energy solution. Although lithium-ion batteries are crucial for storing and integrating renewable energy technologies, including electric vehicles, their production and disposal come with significant environmental concerns. It’s imperative to understand that these processes are not completely benign.
Encouragingly, promising technologies like sodium-ion and solid-state batteries are emerging as viable and potentially safer alternatives. These options could provide cost-effective energy storage solutions; however, they face obstacles such as lower energy density, shorter lifecycle, and an underdeveloped industrial supply chain, resulting in limited mainstream adoption.
Until these new technologies are ready for widespread use, it is essential to carefully consider the location of lithium-ion battery storage facilities. Community safety is paramount, and these projects should be sited far from residential areas. This approach reflects a common-sense standpoint.
Compounding the concerns are the environmental hazards posed by PFAS chemicals, labeled as “forever chemicals” due to their persistence in the environment. The AES project plan incorporates lithium-ion batteries and fire suppression systems containing substantial quantities of PFAS, prompting critical examination of the location’s suitability near residential communities. These communities rely heavily on clean air and well water sourced from nearby aquifers.
The State Land Office has identified more than 9 million acres of land in our state as appropriate for solar and battery installations, such as the proposed project at Rancho Viejo. Therefore, it is perplexing why AES insists on constructing this lithium-ion battery storage facility within a stone’s throw of over 10,000 homes and just a few miles south of the city of Santa Fe.
The lack of site exploration by AES, as revealed during the Santa Fe County Hearings, raises further questions. With known risks of lithium-ion battery fires, underscored by incidents like the one at Moss Landing in California, it’s reasonable to question whether the well-being of residents should be compromised for cost efficiencies benefitting an out-of-state corporation whose environmental record is up for scrutiny.
Our community deserves thoughtful energy solutions that prioritize safety and environmental stewardship. This is not a trivial matter or a case of NIMBYism (not in my backyard); rather, it is a call to protect the ecological integrity of Santa Fe County and the safety of its residents.
Leave a Reply